as for the questionnaire that asks the idea of the policy concern. A lot of items made the difference of the insistence of the bilateral candidate clear like proving the confrontation structural outline that the Democratic Party points "Change of power" at the Liberal-Democratic Party that had been bearing the political power long.
The questionnaire obtained the answer from 1347 people. The recovery factor was 98%.
Especially, treatments of the pension plan and the consumption tax that the difference's having stood out becomes a point of issue in the outlook on the constitution, the diplomacy posture, and the electoral campaign, etc.
Opposite has gone up to 95% in the Democratic Party while 49% of the respondent of the Liberal-Democratic Party agreed that it decides the hike of the consumption tax rate in the tenure of office of four years after it is elected.
The extermination of waste hangs, and the Democratic Party is denying the hike of four years though the Liberal-Democratic Party is assuming that it works on the taxation system drastic measure reform including the consumption tax by 11 fiscal years so that may appeal for "Responsibility political party".
The insistence of the candidate of bilateral is an in the forehead confrontation even if coming round the pension plan. 81% favoured "Basic pension financed entirely from tax revenue" to the Democratic Party though 71% favoured present "Insurance premium method" that appropriated the insurance premium to financial resources of the basic pension to the Liberal-Democratic Party.
However, there are 19% answer with "Basic pension financed entirely from tax revenue" in the Liberal-Democratic Party, too and it is possible to look for the foundation of the pension discussion that exceeds the league.
66% dissented to the Democratic Party though amendment of the Constitution did not become a big issue of House of Representatives election while 82% of the Liberal-Democratic Party had agreed with Article 9 revision in the questionnaire. In the diplomacy posture, 63%, and "It is necessary to move the specific gravity up to now to Asia" is 62% .."It is necessary to value Japan-U.S. dealings most ..Liberal-Democratic Party..".. ..the Democratic Party... Whether it was necessary to dispatch the Self Defense Forces for the Afghanistan support, "It was necessary to dispatch it" was 58 ..Liberal-Democratic Party.. %, and "Should not dispatch it" ..Democratic Party.. was contrasted with 68%.
The total of "Did not assess it" and "Do not assess it at all" accounted for the Democratic Party for 98% about the structural reform that former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi had advanced. In the Liberal-Democratic Party, the total of "Assess it very much" and "Assess it to some degree" is 82%.
The answer of Prime Minister Taro Aso who showed posture in which the structural reform route was amended was "Assess it to some degree. "
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20090819-00000024-maip-pol
Japan is good country!
http://japan-power.net/
PLEASE come here!
The questionnaire obtained the answer from 1347 people. The recovery factor was 98%.
Especially, treatments of the pension plan and the consumption tax that the difference's having stood out becomes a point of issue in the outlook on the constitution, the diplomacy posture, and the electoral campaign, etc.
Opposite has gone up to 95% in the Democratic Party while 49% of the respondent of the Liberal-Democratic Party agreed that it decides the hike of the consumption tax rate in the tenure of office of four years after it is elected.
The extermination of waste hangs, and the Democratic Party is denying the hike of four years though the Liberal-Democratic Party is assuming that it works on the taxation system drastic measure reform including the consumption tax by 11 fiscal years so that may appeal for "Responsibility political party".
The insistence of the candidate of bilateral is an in the forehead confrontation even if coming round the pension plan. 81% favoured "Basic pension financed entirely from tax revenue" to the Democratic Party though 71% favoured present "Insurance premium method" that appropriated the insurance premium to financial resources of the basic pension to the Liberal-Democratic Party.
However, there are 19% answer with "Basic pension financed entirely from tax revenue" in the Liberal-Democratic Party, too and it is possible to look for the foundation of the pension discussion that exceeds the league.
66% dissented to the Democratic Party though amendment of the Constitution did not become a big issue of House of Representatives election while 82% of the Liberal-Democratic Party had agreed with Article 9 revision in the questionnaire. In the diplomacy posture, 63%, and "It is necessary to move the specific gravity up to now to Asia" is 62% .."It is necessary to value Japan-U.S. dealings most ..Liberal-Democratic Party..".. ..the Democratic Party... Whether it was necessary to dispatch the Self Defense Forces for the Afghanistan support, "It was necessary to dispatch it" was 58 ..Liberal-Democratic Party.. %, and "Should not dispatch it" ..Democratic Party.. was contrasted with 68%.
The total of "Did not assess it" and "Do not assess it at all" accounted for the Democratic Party for 98% about the structural reform that former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi had advanced. In the Liberal-Democratic Party, the total of "Assess it very much" and "Assess it to some degree" is 82%.
The answer of Prime Minister Taro Aso who showed posture in which the structural reform route was amended was "Assess it to some degree. "
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20090819-00000024-maip-pol
Japan is good country!
http://japan-power.net/
PLEASE come here!
はてなに追加
MyYahoo!に追加
del.icio.usに追加
livedoorClipに追加
コメントする